Congressman Huelskamp Takes a Stand and gets inducted into the "Hall of Shame."
"Hall of Shame" is a function of the HRC*, Human Rights Campaign, is funded by left-wing activists to the tune of $45 million each year. They have the backing of the uber-wealthy Hollywood elite, the liberal media and the President of the United States.
What do they use this funding for? To bash people of faith like you and me with some of the most extreme fear-mongering tactics you will ever see.
Why? Because they want us to cower in the corner and not speak out for the truth.
And what earned me entry into their so-called "Hall of Shame"?
I authored two pieces of legislation.
The first is a Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as between one man, and one woman. This marriage protection amendment was necessary because this radical organization and their elite judge buddies are colluding to undo our state marriage protection laws in Kansas and in every state of the union.
The second was a bill to protect the First Amendment religious freedom rights of our military men and women at Fort Riley and elsewhere across our nation. In particular, this bill protects would protect the rights of military chaplains and all our soldiers to hold true to the tenets of their faith.
President Obama's radical social agenda is attacking the First Amendment rights of our soldiers. I could not stand idly by and watch that happen, which is why I fought hard to restore these rights.
The first part of the First Amendment is the foundation of our Constitution to our very formation as a nation. And we should protect Religious Liberty at all costs. Even more important is to guard it for those who put themselves in harm's way to protect and defend our rights.
By attempting to scare us into silence, these small-minded, mean spirited attacks by this radical leftist, anti-Christian group flies in the face of what makes America great. Their message is clear -- if you don't agree with them, they will rain down hate upon you without giving it a second thought.
I for one will not bow to this sort of political pressure from the wealthy haters. I will stand up for our values and our Constitutional rights today, tomorrow and for as long as Kansans elect me to serve them.
HRC is getting involved in this race at this time because they know they have a friend in my liberal opponent. As Mayor, he led the charge to ban the Boy Scouts from Manhattan in 2010 and 2011 because of their traditional Christian standards for scout leaders. His ordinance would also have required religious organizations to sacrifice their moral principles to my opponent's own personal morality.
It's no wonder that the citizens of Manhattan rejected this radical attack on the First Amendment at the very next election - and a new city commission immediately restored protections for the Boy Scouts and men and women of faith.
It's also no wonder that radical left-wing organizations want this same liberal college professor to represent them and work with Obama to pass their radical anti-Christian agenda in Washington.
We must be prepared for outside groups like this one, and many others tied to Obama and his radical views -- to continue to attack me in the final 27 days of this campaign in an attempt to prop up my opponent in this race.
Yours in Liberty,
*The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality.
Tea Party Leader filing ethics complaint against United States Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD)
Note: Catherine Engelbrecht founded "True the Vote" and has been a guest speaker at the Patriot Freedom Alliance.
Catherine Engelbrecht, the head of election integrity group True The Vote and Tea Party group King Street Patriots, alleges Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) demanded information from her group in a similar manner to the IRS, according to her testimony. “Hours after sending letters, he would appear on cable news and publicly defame me and my organization,” Engelbrecht said.
The Tea Party leader is filing a formal ethics complaint against Cummings with the Office of Congressional Ethics, a panel of outside advisers who review allegations and refer those they consider to have merit to the official House Ethics Committee.
Engelbrecht is one of several witnesses testifying at an oversight subcommittee hearing on the IRS scandal on Thursday. The committee’s subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation and Regulatory Affairs will be holding a hearing titled: “The IRS Targeting Investigation: What is the Administration Doing?”
In her opening statement, published on the committee’s website late Wednesday, Engelbrecht offers the painstaking details of how the IRS and administration as a whole targeted her, noting “my private businesses, my nonprofit organizations, and family have been subjected to more than 15 instances of audit or inquiry by federal agencies.”
Engelbrecht said she is disgusted with Cummings’ behavior, and that Cummings was engaged in activity that “misrepresent[s] this governing body in an effort to demonize and intimidate citizens.”
“Such tactics are unacceptable,” Engelbrecht wrote in her prepared testimony. “It is for these reasons that immediately after this hearing I am filing a formal complaint with the House Office of Congressional Ethics and asking for a full investigation.”
Earlier in her testimony, Engelbrecht lumped Cummings’ actions in with those of the administration, writing that after she filed IRS papers to create her groups, “an assortment of federal entities – including law enforcement agencies and a Congressman from Maryland, Elijah Cummings – came knocking at my door.”
It is highly unusual for a witness at a hearing to announce she is filing a formal ethics complaint against the ranking member of the committee holding it. Cummings' office did not respond to a request for comment sent late Wednesday.
Cummings has been a Democratic thorn in the side of oversight efforts of full committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) and other committee Republicans on the IRS scandal since he ascended to the top Democratic slot on the committee in 2010.
Cummings released sensitive investigation documents this past summer, including a redacted transcript of an interview committee investigators conducted with IRS employee John Shafer. Cummings did so, according to an NPR story on the matter, because he said the transcript “debunks conspiracy theories about how the IRS first started reviewing these cases.”
But Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) said in response to that renegade Cummings action that it “will severely undermine the Oversight Committee’s ability to gain the full truth of what has transpired at the IRS.”
“Since he called for an end to this investigation, we have learned that IRS officials in Washington had been more involved in the targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups than we initially were lead to believe,” Turner said then. “This maneuver will do nothing more than obstruct the Committee’s investigation. It’s clear that Ranking Member Cummings is concerned only with ending a highly embarrassing and troubling investigation before we learn the full truth of who was responsible and why.”
On the Benghazi scandal, Cummings outed a trip Issa was taking to Libya--something Issa’s office feared could have put the chairman in danger as terror threats were being made against Issa’s life at the time by a Libyan national.
Testifying along with Engelbrecht at Thursday’s IRS hearing will be American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) chief counsel Jay Sekulow, Alabama’s Wetumpka Tea Party president Becky Gerritson and lawyer Cleta Mitchell of Foley & Lardner LLP. Barbara Bosserman of the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division is invited to testify, according to the House Oversight Committee’s website but has not confirmed.
Senate Filibuster Rule is Removed
Today’s events in the United States Senate strongly support action against this lawless and “above it all elected-senators.”
Today’s change in the filibuster rule (i.e., the Nuclear Option) by the senate-controlled democrat party bodes very poorly for the country and constitutional governance. Let me explain:
The rule change today fundamentally states that the democrats have effectively said that minority opinion in our system of government is gone under certain considerations. Specifically, the Republicans have blocked a number of leftist judge appointments and the new rule means that judgeships will now pass by a senatorial simple majority rather than the Constitutionally-mandated 60 votes.
In 1789, the Founding Fathers enacted two distinct rule-making methods; by having a senate 60-member vote to pass and ensuring that minority groups in the senate would have their voices heard. With the House it is a simple majority. The former senate option for judgeships is now gone. And remember that the current administration wants to pack all courts with left-leaning ideologues.
Frankly, I was shocked at the announcement today. Why—not so much about judges (although judges should not be chosen how they are—too much input from “lawyers”), but by virtue of any other similarly held vote in the democratic-held senate on any measure that can be brought into law by a “simple majority.”
Read into that last statement: Immigration reform, Gun legislation / confiscation, Obamacare (the action today is also said to be to take the attention off Obama-care), Agenda 21, Education (Common Core et al), EPA, Race issues, youth crime and a host of other issues. Add your own, the list is nearly limitless.
We can fully expect that the president will sign senate-initiated legislation (as he has done with certain illegal spending bills) and leave the Republican-controlled US House totally out of the picture. This is neither good of America nor worthy of a Nation built on “rules of law.”
Chuck Sankey November 21, 2013